NEON-LED take the inventive patent of Neo-Neon as non-effective for LED NEON-FLEX
Please have a attension as following news:
NEON-LED take the inventive patent of Neo-Neon as non-effective for LED NEON-FLEX
Recently, Mr. Raymond Chen, the director of NEON-LED Group received the Judgments that NEON-LED take the inventive patent of Neo-Neon as non-effective for LED NEON-FLEX from the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of P. R. China by DOC 11842. After read these documents, you will know the result,we successfully take NEO-NEON's inventive patent as non-effective. The rights in the patent have 13 articles we totally canceled their 10 articles included absolute right 1.
By the reason mentioned before, Neo-Neon take a court to NEON-LED was the game of business that to press a new factory to stop them grow-up by their strong money. But NEON-LED grow-up strongger by their own technology and NEON-LED will show more new products on Hongkong International lighting Fair 2008, Hongkong at Hongkong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Expo Drive Hall, Booth Room EDJ09 at 2008-10-27 to 30. You are welcome to visit and meet us face to face.
Since March of 2007, a dissension about the LED NEON-FLEX patent was host by Neo-Neon and Neon-Led in the Jiangmen Court . After polarize violently in the cour and the case of required by Mr. Raymond Chen to
ruled
Neo-Neon's patent as non-effective at
the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of P. R. China by case W401698, this lowsuit running over one year.
At the end of June of 2008, the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of P. R. China finally iussed a Judgments for NEO-NEON's inventive patent as non-effective by DOC 11842. Please see the scaned pages as following:
|
|
 |
Case W40169 and DOC 11842 |
If anyone want to know the detail, please contact Mr. Raymond Chen to get the full DOC by E-Mail: neonled#hotmail.com (please use @ instead of # when you send the e-mail) .
NEON-LED win the Judgment of lawsuit for LED NEON-FLEX Patents
Recently, Mr. Raymond Chen, the director of NEON-LED Group received the Judgments from Guangzhou Court for the lawsuit between Neo-Neon and Neon-Led for LED NEON-FLEX patents.
Since Jan. 2007, a dissension about the LED NEON-FLEX patent was host by Neo-Neon and Neon-Led in the Guangzhou Court . After polarize violently in the cour and the case of required by Mr. Raymond Chen to ruled Neo-Neon's patent as non-effective at the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of P. R. China, this lowsuit lasted drearily over half a year.
At the end of July 2007, the court has accepted petition from Neo-Neon to abnegate their claim to ended this case finally.
| |
 |
End of Case
2006-417 |
Lawsuit for Patents
NEON-LED apply a case to adjudge Neo-Neon's patent as noneffective patent
Raymond Chen, the Factory Director of NEON-LED Group, has take a claim at The State Intellectual Property Office of P. R. China (SIPO) to adjudge Neo-Neon's patent ZL 200320130244.9 as noneffective patent. Recently, The State Intellectual Property Office of P. R. China (SIPO) accepted our appeal of filing a Case W508475.
|
|
 |
Case W508475 |
Heshan Yinyu Lighting-Decoration Ltd, the factory of Neo-Neon Holding Company Limited, announced that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Raymond Chen and NEON-LED at Guangzhou Local Court. We have to let our clients, friends and all peoples work at the decorative lighting field to know a fact, that iLight Technologies, an LED lighting manufacturer based in Chicago, has filed a lawsuits against Tivoli (Tivoli, LLC of Santa Ana, California is a joint venture between Targetti North America and Neo-Neon Holding Company Limited) at March 24, 2006 already. The case filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Case no. 2-060026) . iLight Technologies says that Tivoli has created a copy of the Plexineon product and has ignored iLight's patent rights in the United States. That's clearly to understand that Neo-Neon's patent ZL 200320130244.9 was a copy and distinctly, it was noneffective patent.
Raymond Chen, Several years ago was a Vice-Chief Engineer of Neo-Neon, work from 1994, was the first engineer for decorative lighting series of Neo-Neon till 2000. He designed and lead the R&D term designed more and more new products and apply many patents for the boss of Neo-Neon but no list name on the patent licenses and record. However, even left Neo-Neon over 6 years, He still focus the lighting and have more and more good ideas for LED lighting. He lead his own team developed their patented product LED NEON-FLEX as well as Glass Neon lighting effect and make distinctions absolutely than Neo-Neon's patent.
Relative Link:
http://ledsmagazine.com/articles/news/4/1/18?alert=1
http://www.ilight-tech.com/news.htm
http://ledsmagazine.com/articles/news/3/3/27/1
|